Unconventional Fossil Fuels Factsheet

Click PDF to download a printable version: 

Patterns of Use

Globally, fossil fuels supply 81% of primary energy.1 In 2019, 80% of U.S. primary energy consumption came from fossil fuels.2 Conventional and unconventional fossil fuels differ in their geologic locations and accessibility; conventional fuels are often found in discrete, easily accessible reservoirs, while unconventional fuels are found in pore spaces throughout a wide geologic formation, requiring advanced extraction techniques.3 If unconventional oil resources (oil shale, oil sands, extra heavy oil, and natural bitumen) are accounted for, the global oil reserves quadruple current conventional reserves.4 The price of crude oil peaked in 2008 at $145.31 per barrel, making unconventional fossil fuels more cost-competitive.5 However, in 2020, the price of crude oil temporary fell below zero.5 Partially due to sustained low oil prices, over 200 oil and gas producers have filed for bankruptcy since 2015.6 The Energy Policy Act of 2005 includes provisions to promote U.S. oil sands, oil shale, and unconventional natural gas development.7

GLOBAL PROJECTED LIQUID FUEL PRODUCTION8

Global Projected Liquid Fuel Production

Major Unconventional Sources

Unconventional Natural Gas

  • Unconventional natural gas (UG) comes primarily from three sources: shale gas found in lowpermeability shale formations; tight gas found in low-permeability sandstone and carbonate reservoirs; and coalbed methane (CBM) found in coal seams.9
  • Although several countries have begun producing UG, many global resources have yet to be assessed. According to current estimates, China has the largest technically recoverable shale gas resource with 1,115 trillion cubic feet (Tcf), followed by Argentina (802 Tcf) and Algeria (707 Tcf).10 Global tight gas resources are estimated at 2,684 Tcf, with the largest in Asia/Pacific and Latin America.9 Resources of CBM are estimated at 1,660 Tcf, with more than 75% in Eastern Europe/Eurasia and Asia/Pacific.9
  • Recoverable U.S. resources are estimated at 1611 Tcf from shale and tight gas and 105 Tcf from CBM.11
  • UG, particularly shale and tight gas, is most commonly extracted through hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking.” A mixture of fluid (usually water) and sand is pumped underground at extreme pressures to create cracks in the geologic formation, allowing gas to flow out. When the pressure is released, a portion of the fluid returns as “flowback,” and the sand remains as a “proppant,” keeping the fractures open.9
  • UG accounted for 87% of total U.S. natural gas production in 2019 and is expected to account for 92% of production by 2050.12

Hydraulic Fracturing Horizontal Well9

Hydraulic Fracturing Horizontal Well

Tight Oil

  • Tight oil, or shale oil, is found in impermeable rocks such as shale or limestone and is extracted through fracking and is often extracted concurrently with natural gas.13
  • Over the past decade, tight oil production has expanded significantly. In 2019, 63% (7.7 million barrels per day) of crude oil production in the U.S. came from tight oil.14 Top tight oil producing states include Texas, North Dakota, New Mexico, Colorado, and Oklahoma.15
  • It is estimated that the U.S. has 174 Bbbl of technically recoverable tight oil.11
  • Negative health effects in newborns from in utero exposure to fracking sites have been found.18

Annual U.S. Crude Oil Production16,17

Oil Sands

  • Oil sands, i.e., “tar sands” or “natural bitumen,” are a combination of sand (83%), bitumen (10%), water (4%), and clay (3%). Bitumen is a semisolid, tar-like mixture of hydrocarbons.19
  • Known oil sands deposits exist in 23 countries. Canada has 73% of global estimated oil sands, approximately 2.4 trillion barrels (bbls) of oil.20 The U.S. has 1.6% of global oil sands resources; however, 56% of U.S. crude oil imports came from Canada in 2019, and 64% of Canadian production comes from oil sands.20,21,22
  • Deposits less than 250 feet below the surface are mined and processed to separate the bitumen.23 Deeper deposits employ in situ (underground) methods, including steam or solvent injection to liquify the bitumen so that it can be extracted from the ground. Bitumen must be upgraded to synthetic crude oil (SCO) before it is refined into petroleum products.19
  • Two tons of oil sands produce one barrel of SCO.19

Oil Sands Resources, Top 3 Countries20

Oil Sands Resources, Top 3 Countries

OIL Shale

  • Oil shale is a sedimentary rock with deposits of organic compounds called kerogen, which has not undergone enough geologic pressure, heat, and time to become conventional oil. Oil shale can be heated to generate petroleum-like liquids.24
  • Oil shale deposits exist in 33 countries.4 The U.S. has the largest oil shale resource in the world, approximately 6 trillion bbls of oil in place, however, oil shale is far from commercial development.4,25

Life Cycle Impacts

Greenhouse Gases

  • Fossil fuel combustion accounted for 75% of U.S. greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in 2018.26
  • Equivalent amounts of GHGs are released by conventional and unconventional fuels at the point of use. Life cycle emissions for unconventional oil are higher than conventional oil on average, though some studies suggest they are similar.27 Studies have found life cycle emissions for oil sands are 17% higher than average refined U.S. crude, and oil shale emissions are 21% to 47% higher than conventional oil.28,29 Studies of life cycle emissions for UG have resulted in estimates from 6% lower to 43% higher than conventional natural gas sources.30,31
  • Overall, natural gas generates fewer GHG emissions when combusted than other fossil fuels.32 Natural gas, however, is primarily methane (CH4) and CH4 leakage can significantly decrease any emissions benefit of natural gas over other fossil fuels.30 CH4 leakage from the U.S. oil and natural gas supply chain is estimated to be 13 million metric tons (MMT) per year, equivalent to 2.3% of U.S. annual gross natural gas production and nearly 42% of U.S. anthropogenic CH4 emissions. With a global warming potential of 28, this leakage is equivalent to 364 MMT of CO2, or 5.5% of total U.S. GHG emissions in 2018.26,33,34

Water

  • Producing one barrel of oil from oil shale uses 1 to 12 barrels of water for in-situ production and 2 to 4 barrels of water for mining production; one barrel of oil from oil sands uses 0.4 to 3.1 barrels of water.35,36 Producing one barrel of oil in Saudi Arabia requires 1.4 barrels of water.37
  • A horizontal gas well can require 2 to 4 million gallons of water to drill and fracture.38 One study found shale gas production consumes up to four times more water than producing conventional natural gas.32
  • CBM production requires groundwater extraction; U.S. CBM basins withdraw 32 million to 15 billion gallons of water from aquifers per year.39
  • Wastewater, produced water, and flowback water from oil and gas extraction can contain excess salts, high levels of trace elements, and naturally-occurring radioactive materials.40 Groundwater can be polluted through above- and below-ground activities, including construction, drilling, chemical spills, leaks, and discharge of wastewater.41

Land Impacts and Waste

  • More than 75% of U.S. oil shale is on federal land, of which 678,700 acres has been designated for development.42,43 A 20,000 bbl/day oil sands facility requires 2,950 acres of land and creates 52,000 tons/day of sand waste; a 25,000-30,000 bbl/day oil shale facility requires 300-1,200 acres and creates 17 to 23 million tons/year of waste. An oil shale facility often remains active for several years.44
    • One gas well requires one to two hectares of land, in addition to road networks.45 Drilling fluid, or “mud,” is used to cool the drill bit, regulate pressure, and remove rock fragments.9 One well may require hundreds of tons of mud and produce 110 to 550 tons of rock cuttings.9
    • Small to moderate magnitude (<M6) seismic activity has been linked to underground injection of wastewater produced in oil and gas operations.46 Fracking has been associated with microearthquakes (<M2), but no association has been found with larger magnitude events.47
    • The human toxicity impact (HTI) of electricity produced from shale gas is estimated to be 1-2 orders of magnitude less than that from coal. Particulate matter is the dominant factor for both systems.48

​PRODUCTION COST RANGES, CONVENTIONAL AND UNCONVENTIONAL FOSSIL FUELS19

Production Cost Ranges, Conventional and Unconventional Fossil Fuels

Solutions and Sustainable Alternatives

  • Chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing fluid are often considered proprietary.45 Requiring companies to disclose these chemicals will lead to better understanding of the risk to public health from their use.38 28 U.S. states required disclosure as of 2016.49
  • Careful siting and monitoring of injection wells can reduce the potential for seismic events.9
  • Water consumption in oil and gas extraction can be significantly reduced through efficiency improvements and the recycling of wastewater.
  • Support policies that increase energy efficiency and renewable energy use. Although natural gas has been considered preferable to other fossil fuels because it is less expensive and burns more cleanly, it ultimately remains a nonrenewable fuel and a source of GHG emissions.
References: 
  1. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2019) Key World Energy Statistics 2019.
  2. U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2020) Monthly Energy Review June 2020.
  3. Behrens, C., et al. (2011) U.S. Fossil Fuel Resources: Terminology, Reporting, and Summary.
  4. World Energy Council (2016) World Energy Resources 2016.
  5. U.S. EIA (2020) “Spot Prices for Crude Oil and Petroleum Products.”
  6. Haynes and Boone (2020) Oil Patch Bankruptcy Monitor.
  7. U.S. Congress (2005) Energy Policy Act of 2005. 109th Congress.
  8. U.S. EIA (2018) Annual Energy Outlook 2018.
  9. IEA (2012) “Golden Rules for a Golden Age of Gas: World Energy Outlook Special Report.”
  10. U.S. EIA (2013) Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources: An Assessment of 137 Shale Formations in 41 Countries Outside the United States.
  11. U.S. EIA (2020) Assumptions to the Annual Energy Outlook 2020: Oil and Gas Supply Module.
  12. U.S. EIA (2020) Annual Energy Outlook 2020.
  13. Union of Concerned Scientists (2016) “What is Tight Oil?”
  14. U.S. EIA (2020) “How much shale (tight) oil is produced in the United States?”
  15. U.S. EIA (2019) U.S. Crude Oil Production Grew 17% in 2018, Surpassing the Previous Record in 1970.
  16. U.S. EIA (2020) Crude Oil Production.
  17. U.S. EIA (2020) Tight Oil Production Estimates by Play.
  18. Raimi, D. (2018) The Health Impacts of the Shale Revolution. Resources for the Future.
  19. IEA Energy Technology Network (2010) Unconventional Oil & Gas Production.
  20. World Energy Council (2010) 2010 Survey of Global Resources.
  21. U.S. EIA (2020) U.S. Crude Oil Imports by Country of Origin.
  22. Natural Resources Canada (2019) “Crude Oil Facts.”
  23. Ramseur, J., et al. (2014) Oil Sands and the Keystone XL Pipeline. Congressional Research Service.
  24. Colorado School of Mines (2020) “About Oil Shale.”
  25. U.S. EIA (2017) Annual Energy Outlook 2017.
  26. U.S. EPA (2020) Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2018.
  27. Argonne National Laboratory (2015) “Analysis shows GHG emissions similar for shale, crude oil.”
  28. Lattanzio, R. (2014) Canadian Oil Sands: Life Cycle Assessments of Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
  29. Brandt, A. (2008) “Converting oil shale to liquid fuels: energy inputs and greenhouse gas emissions of the shell in situ conversion process.” Environmental Science & Technology, 42(19): 7489-7495.
  30. Burnham, A., et al. (2012) “Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of shale gas, natural gas, coal, and petroleum.” Environmental Science & Technology, 46(2): 619-627.
  31. Howarth, R., et al. (2011) “Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations.” Climatic Change, 106(4): 679-690.
  32. Clark, C., et al. (2013) Hydraulic Fracturing and Shale Gas Production: Technology, Impacts, and Regulations. Argonne National Laboratory.
  33. Alvarez, R. et al. (2018) Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain. Science, 361(6398): 186-188.
  34. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2013) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis.
  35. U.S. Government Accountabiliy Office (GAO) (2011) Impacts of Potential Oil Shale Development on Water Resources.
  36. Yale School of the Environment (2013) “With Tar Sands Development, Growing Concern on Water Use.”
  37. Wu, M. and Y. Chiu (2011) Consumptive Water Use in the Production of Ethanol and Petroleum Gasoline - 2011 Update. Argonne National Laboratory.
  38. U.S. Department of Energy (2009) Modern Shale Gas Development in the United States: A Primer.
  39. U.S. EPA (2010) Coalbed Methane Extraction: Detailed Study Report.
  40. U.S. EPA (2020) “Unconventional Oil and Gas Extraction Effluent Guidelines.”
  41. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) (2012) Water Quality Studied in Areas of Unconventional Oil and Gas Development, Including Areas Where Hydraulic Fracturing Techniques are Used, in the United States.
  42. U.S. DOE (2012) Assessment of Plans and Progress on US Bureau of Land Management Oil Shale RD&D Leases in the United States.
  43. U.S. BLM (2017) Final Oil Shale Rule.
  44. U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) (2012) Proposed Land Use Plan Amendments for Allocation of Oil Shale and Tar Sands Resources on Lands Administered by the Bureau of Land Management in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming and Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement.
  45. United Nations Environment Programme (2012) “Gas fracking: can we safely squeeze the rocks?”
  46. USGS (2020) “Myths and Misconceptions About Induced Earthquakes.”
  47. Ellsworth, W. (2013) “Injection-induced earthquakes.” Science, 341: 6142.
  48. Chen, L., et al. (2017) “Comparative human toxicity impact of electricity produced from shale gas and coal.” Environmental Science and Technology 51(21): 13018–13027.
  49. Konschnik, K. and A. Dayalu (2016) “Hydraulic fracturing chemicals reporting: Analysis of available data and recommendations for policymakers.” Energy Policy 88: 504-514.
Cite as: 
Center for Sustainable Systems, University of Michigan. 2020. "Unconventional Fossil Fuels Factsheet." Pub. No. CSS13-19.