Autogestion and the political potential of informality
This essay considers the political potential of informality as a force for challenging authoritarianism and creating more equal and democratic outcomes. Building on Bandauko's concept of ‘subaltern surveillance,’ this essay demonstrates how informal actors leverage their marginalized position and bottom-up efforts to confront state repression and claim the right to the city. Grassroots initiatives are inextricably linked to ‘autogestion’ – the radical self-management of socio-spatial production in pursuit of democracy and popular sovereignty. Because informality can constitute the praxis of autogestion, its global prevalence suggests an unrealized potential as a political project in research and practice. Drawing on emerging literature on political informality, I aim to re-energize scholarship within and beyond human and urban geography, reflecting the urgency of informality as a continuing force in global spatial transformation.
Autogestion, political informality, right to the city, subaltern surveillance, urban informality
Finn, B. M. (2026). Autogestion and the political potential of informality. Dialogues in Human Geography, 0(0). CSS26-26