Nuclear Energy Factsheet

Nuclear power plants generate electricity by using controlled nuclear fission chain reactions to heat water and produce steam that powers turbines. Nuclear is often labeled “clean” energy because no greenhouse gases (GHGs) or air emissions are released from the power plant. It has the highest capacity factor (92% in 2024) of any power plant type.1,2 As the U.S. and other nations seek low-emission energy sources, nuclear power’s benefits must be weighed against costs, operational risks, and challenges of storing fuel and managing radioactive waste.

Fission of Uranium-235 in a Nuclear Reactor
Image
Fission of Uranium-235 in a Nuclear Reactor

Nuclear Resources and Energy Use 

  • Uranium is extracted primarily by in-situ leaching (60%), underground mining (18%), and open pit mining (16%).3
  • Most nuclear reactors use enriched uranium with higher concentrations of uranium-235 (U-235) isotopes, which split more easily to produce energy. Mined uranium ore averages less than 1% U-235.4
  • Total identified recoverable resources exceed 7.9 Mt, with 75% recoverable at reasonable cost (<$130/kg).3 The largest deposits are in Australia (28%), Kazakhstan (14%), Canada (10%), Russia (8%), and Namibia (8%); only 1% is in the U.S.3
  • U.S. nuclear plants purchased 23 kt of uranium in 2023, up 27% from 2022,5 importing from Canada (25%), Kazakhstan (21%), Australia (21%), and Russia (12%).5 The U.S. banned Russian uranium imports in 2024.6
  • The first U.S. nuclear plant began commercial operations in 1958.1 Over 50 reactors came online during the 1970s.2 As of August 2023, 28 states operated 93 nuclear reactors at 54 plants with 95 GW net summer capacity.1
  • Nuclear provided 9% of global electricity in 2023, with the U.S. generating nearly one-third of this.9 Nuclear has provided about 18% of U.S. electricity annually since the 1990s.2
  • Small modular reactors (SMRs) are advanced reactors producing up to 300 MW(e) per module, offering flexible power generation with cost and construction time savings.10
  • Only one SMR plant has operated commercially since 2020 (Russia’s Akademik Lomonosov). Others are under construction or licensing in Argentina, Canada, China, Russia, South Korea, and the U.S.11
U.S. Electricity Generation by Source2
Image
U.S. Electricity Generation by Source

 
Largest Identified Uranium Resources3
U.S. Electricity Generation by Source8

Economic Impacts

  • Exploration and mine development expenditures for 2021-2023 totaled $2.1B. Six countries accounted for 90% of expenditures, with Canada alone representing 34%.3
  • Global uranium mine production increased 4% from 2020 to 2022. After five years of decline, production increased in 2022 following strong price recovery.3
  • Nuclear has several advantages relative to other forms of electricity generation:  it requires relatively little land and fuel, and can operate continuously except for maintenance, refueling, and emergency shutdowns. However, nuclear has high levelized costs (LCOE)—about twice that of combined cycle natural gas and three times that of utility solar or onshore wind.12  
  • Final construction costs for U.S. nuclear plants typically exceed original estimates by 2-3 times due to delays. Plants begun after 1970 averaged cost overruns of 241%.13
  • Only two new U.S. nuclear projects have begun since 1990, both requiring federal subsidies. The VC Summer dual reactor project in South Carolina was abandoned in 2017 with $9B in sunk costs.13
  • The Vogtle reactors in Georgia began operation in 2023 and 2024,14 seven years behind schedule, with total costs reaching $35B, 2.5 times the projected cost of $14B.13 Vogtle can power 500,000 buildings, and is expected to operate for 60-80 years.14
  • Recent projects in the U.K., France, and Finland have experienced similar delays and cost overruns, while China, Japan, and South Korea have completed plants faster and closer to budget.13,15
     

Energy and Environmental Impacts

  • A uranium fuel pellet (~0.5” in height and diameter) contains energy equivalent to 1 t of coal or 149 gal of oil.17 A typical 1 GW reactor holds 18M pellets.18
  • The nuclear fuel cycle encompasses producing, using, and disposing of uranium fuel. Powering a 1 GW plant annually requires mining 20-40 kt of ore, processing it into uranium fuel, and disposing of spent fuel.19 
     
Nuclear Fuel Cycle16
Image
Nuclear Fuel Cycle
  • 3% of this waste requires cooling and shielding.20 Each kWh of nuclear electricity requires 0.1-0.3 kWh of life cycle energy inputs.21
  • Although nuclear electricity generation itself produces no GHG emissions, other fuel cycle activities do. Life cycle GHG intensity ranges from 5.4-122 g CO₂e/kWh,22,46 far below other baseload sources like coal (1,001 g CO2e/kWh).24 Mining and milling represent nearly 50% of emissions.46
     
Life Cycle GHG Emissions of Nuclear(g CO23e/kWh)23
  • Nuclear power plants use 270-670 gal/MWh of water, depending on operating efficiency and site conditions.25 For pressurized and boiling water reactors, most environmental impacts stem from fuel element extraction and production.26
  • Advanced reactor designs like SMRs and closed fuel cycles with recycling capabilities could improve nuclear energy’s long-term sustainability.3

Nuclear Waste 

  • The U.S. generated 89,178 t of commercial spent fuel and reprocessing waste, stored at over 100 sites in 39 states as of 2021.27 Reprocessing used nuclear fuel can reduce waste and extract 25-30% more energy.28
  • Spent fuel is stored in wet pools or dry casks in the U.S. While wet pools were more common, many sites are reaching capacity. Dry cask storage is increasingly used, storing 50% of spent fuel in 2021, up from 27% in 2011.27,29
  • 10 years after use, spent fuel assemblies release 10,000 rem/hr of radiation, far exceeding the fatal whole-body dose of 500 rem for humans.30 
Spent Commercial Nuclear Fuel (t)35
Dose from Common Radiation Sources (mrem)36
  • Managing nuclear waste requires very long-term planning. U.S. EPA set radiation exposure limits in permanent storage facilities over an unprecedented 1 million-year timeframe.31
  • The U.S. has no permanent storage site. Nevada’s Yucca Mountain was proposed as a site to hold 70 kt of waste,32 but is no longer under consideration due to political pressure and local opposition.33
  • The Nuclear Waste Policy Act required the U.S. federal government to begin controlling spent nuclear fuel in 1998. When this did not occur, the government became liable  for reactor site storage costs.34

Safety and Public Policy

  • In 1986, explosions at the Chernobyl nuclear plant in Ukraine resulted in 134 workers and emergency responders diagnosed with acute radiation syndrome. 28 died within weeks. 350k people were evacuated and/or permanently resettled, and a 1,000 mi2 Chernobyl Exclusion Zone was established to restrict public access.37
  • On March 11, 2011, an M9.0 earthquake near Fukushima, Japan triggered a tsunami that damaged reactor cooling systems, causing meltdowns. Radiation releases were lower than Chernobyl and mostly deposited in the Pacific Ocean. About 150k people were evacuated, with no deaths or radiation sickness directly linked to the accident.38
  • The U.S. Price-Anderson Act limits nuclear plant owner liability to $500M for individual plants and $16.3B across all plants for radioactive releases.39
  • The Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal allocated $6B for the Civilian Nuclear Credit program to prevent premature retirement of existing nuclear plants.40
  • Federal incentives for new nuclear plants include insurance against regulatory delays, a production tax credit (PTC), an investment tax credit (ITC) and federal loan guarantees.41,42,43 After 2027, new projects using nuclear fuel from countries like Russia or China will no longer qualify for these tax credits.45
  • The U.S. DOE announced a $1.5B loan to reopen the 800 MW Palisades nuclear power plant in Michigan in 2024.44
Cite As

Center for Sustainable Systems, University of Michigan. 2025. "Nuclear Energy Factsheet." Pub. No. CSS11-15.

1.          U.S. EIA (2023) “Nuclear Explained: U.S. Nuclear Industry.”      

https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/nuclear/us-nuclear-industry.php

2.          U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2024) Monthly Energy Review July 2025              

https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/

3.          U.S. NEA & IAEA (2025) Uranium 2024 Resources, Production and Demand           

https://www.oecd-nea.org/jcms/pl_103179/uranium-2024-resources-production-and-demand?details=true

4.          U.S. NRC (2020) “Uranium Enrichment.”              

http://www.nrc.gov/materials/fuel-cycle-fac/ur-enrichment.html

5.          U.S. EIA (2024) 2023 Uranium Marketing Annual Report.            

https://www.eia.gov/uranium/marketing/

6.          U.S. DOS (2024) Prohibiting Imports of Uranium Products from the Russian Federation              

https://www.state.gov/prohibiting-imports-of-uranium-products-from-the-russian-federation/

9.          U.S. EIA (2025) International Energy Statistics Total Electricity Generation          

https://www.eia.gov/international/data/world

10.        IAEA (2024) Small Modular Reactors              

https://www.iaea.org/topics/small-modular-reactors

11.        IAEA (2023) What are small modular reactors           

https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/what-are-small-modular-reactors-smrs

12.        Lazard (2025) Lazard’s 2025 LCOE Plus Report 

https://www.lazard.com/media/xemfey0k/lazards-lcoeplus-june-2024-_vf.pdf

13.        Eash-Gates, P., et al. (2020) "Sources of Cost Overrun in Nuclear Power Plant Construction Call for a New Approach to Engineering Design." Joule, 4: 2348-2373   

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S254243512030458X?dgcid=author#bib19

14.        Georgia Power (2024) Vogtle Unit 4 enters commercial operation           

https://www.georgiapower.com/news-hub/press-releases/vogtle-unit-4-enters-commercial-operation.html

15.        Financial Times (2024) Cost overruns and delays risk nuclear’s place in energy transition        

https://www.ft.com/content/65e40e41-1a6c-4bc6-b109-610f5de82c09

16.        U.S. NRC (2020) Stages of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle       

https://www.nrc.gov/materials/fuel-cycle-fac/stages-fuel-cycle.html

17.        Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) (2020) “Nuclear Fuel.”           

https://www.nei.org/fundamentals/nuclear-fuel

18.        WNA (2022) “Nuclear Power Reactors.”              

https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/nuclear-power-reactors/nuclear-power-reactors.aspx

19.        WNA (2024) “Nuclear Fuel Cycle Overview.”       

http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/introduction/nuclear-fuel-cycle-overview.aspx

20.        WNA (2022) “Radioactive Waste Management.”             

http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/nuclear-wastes/radioactive-waste-management.aspx

21.        Lenzen, M. (2008) "Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions of nuclear energy: A review." Energy Conversion and Management, 49: 2178-2199.            

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0196890408000575

22.        Norgate, T., et al. (2014) "The impact of uranium ore grade on the greenhouse gas footprint of nuclear power." Journal of Cleaner Production, 84:360-367.       

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652613007981

23.        Sovacool, B. (2008) "Valuing the greenhouse gas emissions from nuclear power: A critical survey." Energy Policy, 36: 2940-2953.              

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.04.017

24.        Whitaker, M., et al. (2012) "Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Coal-Fired Electricity Generation." Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16: S53-S72.             

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00465.x/abstract

25.        Macknick, J., et al. (2011) A Review of Operational Water Consumption and Withdrawal Factors for Electricity Generating Technologies. U.S. DOE, National Renewable Energy Laboratory.     

http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/50900.pdf

26.        Gibon, T., et al. (2017) "Life cycle assessment demonstrates environmental co-benefits and trade-offs of low-carbon electricity supply options." Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76: 1283-1290              

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032117304215

27.        U.S. DOE, SRNL & PNNL (2022) Spent Nuclear Fuel and Reprocessing Waste Inventory         

https://www.pnnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-33938.pdf

28.        WNA (2020) "Processing of Used Nuclear Fuel."              

http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/fuel-recycling/processing-of-used-nuclear-fuel.aspx

29.        Werner, J. (2012) U.S. Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage. Congressional Research Service.              

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42513.pdf

30.        U.S. NRC (2019) “Backgrounder on Radioactive Waste.”  

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/radwaste.html

31.        U.S EPA (2024) "Public Health and Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Yucca Mountain, Nevada (40 CFR Part 197)"              

https://www.epa.gov/radiation/public-health-and-environmental-radiation-protection-standards-yucca-mountain-nevada-40

32.        U.S. DOE (2008) Analysis of the Total System Life Cycle Cost of the Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Program, Fiscal Year 2007.        

https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0927/ML092710177.pdf

33.        Los Angeles Times (2019) "Americans are paying more than ever to store deadly nuclear waste."           

https://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-radioactive-nuclear-waste-storage-20190614-story.html

34.        U.S. DOE (2013) Strategy for the Management and Disposal of Used Nuclear Fuel and High Level Radioactive Waste.      

http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/Strategy%20for%20the%20Management%20and%20Disposal%20of%20Used%20Nuclear%20Fuel%20and%20High%20Level%20Radioactive%20Waste.pdf

35.        NEI (2022) "Used Fuel Storage and Nuclear Waste Fund Payments by State."   

https://www.nei.org/resources/statistics/used-fuel-storage-and-nuclear-waste-fund-payments

36.        U.S. EPA (2018) "Radiation Sources and Doses."             

https://www.epa.gov/radiation/radiation-sources-and-doses#dosescommon

37.        WNA (2024) Chernobyl Accident 1986.              

https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/safety-and-security/safety-of-plants/chernobyl-accident.aspx

38.        WNA (2024) Fukushima Daiichi Accident.        

https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/safety-and-security/safety-of-plants/fukushima-accident.aspx

39.        U.S. NRC (2024) Nuclear Insurance and Disaster Relief.            

https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/nuclear-insurance.html

40.        U.S. DOE (2021) DOE Fact Sheet: The Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal Will Deliver For American Workers, Families and Usher in the Clean Energy Future 

https://www.energy.gov/articles/doe-fact-sheet-bipartisan-infrastructure-deal-will-deliver-american-workers-families-and-0

41.        Holt, M. (2014) Nuclear Energy Policy. Congressional Research Service.    

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL33558.pdf

42.        U.S. DOE (2022) "Inflation reduction Act Keeps Momentum Building for Nuclear Power."              

https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/inflation-reduction-act-keeps-momentum-building-nuclear-power

43.        U.S. DOE (2021) "Advanced Nuclear Energy Projects Loan Guarantees." 

https://www.energy.gov/lpo/advanced-nuclear-energy-projects-loan-guarantees

44.        U.S. DOE (2024) Biden-Harris Administration Announces $1.5 Billion Conditional Commitment to Holtec Palisades to Support Recommission of Michigan Nuclear Power Plant    

https://www.energy.gov/articles/biden-harris-administration-announces-15-billion-conditional-commitment-holtec-palisades

45.        Columbia University SIPA (2025) Assessing the Energy Impacts of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act         

https://www.energypolicy.columbia.edu/assessing-the-energy-impacts-of-the-one-big-beautiful-bill-act/#:~:text=The%20One%20Big%20Beautiful%20Bill%20Act%20(OBBBA)%2C%20signed%20into,clean%20energy%20and%20climate%20initiatives.

46.        "Gibon, T., et al. (2023) Parametric Life Cycle Assessment of Nuclear Power for Simplified Models"    

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.est.3c03190?ref=article_openPDF

We're interested in our audience - please let us know if you're here as a:

Thank you for responding to our survey!